1st Birthday Celebrations - Personal Thoughts on a year of blogging...
Today
(2nd July) marks the 1st anniversary of my return to
blogging on ThinPinstripedLine. Now nearly 90 articles and well over 100,000 article
views later, I want to quickly set out my strictly thoughts on the blog and the state
its in.
This
blog was initially born in late 2011 when I worked for the MOD and as a Reservist to
capture my personal frustrations about the poor coverage in the media of
Defence issues, and in particular the dreadful stereotyping of the MOD Civil
Service, who to this day I believe is the vital 4th arm of Defence
and this nations security. I stopped the blog on request in 2014 when it was
felt by others that it had run its course and did not restart it until after my
circumstances changed.
The
role of this site is a very simple one, I want to set out in my own time,
sitting in the spare room at home, my take on the world of defence and
national security based on publicly available open source media. I believe that
the UK MOD, and the UK is a globally relevant, capable and credible power that
acts as an inspiration to others, sets the benchmark for how a modern military
should run, and provides this nation with far more influence than we like as a
nation to admit.
Furthermore,
I believe that many difficult decisions are often taken for extremely good reasons
that are hard to rationalise unless you are in full possession of the facts. I
work to the assumption that things happen for a reason that we as outsiders are
not usually privy to.
Finally
I believe that there is an exceptional ‘good news’ story to be told about the
way that the UK is fortunate enough to have exceptional armed forces personnel
at all levels who sacrifice much to keep us safe, superb public servants in the
Ministry of Defence doing a difficult job well and a world class defence industry
that underpins our ability as a nation to deliver so effectively on operations.
We should praise these three pillars of our security far more than we do,
rather than do them down and take them for granted.
But while
this blog will remain a champion of defence, it cannot function without the
concept of ‘loyal opposition’. I am not afraid to raise concerns where I hold them,
but equally I hope that this is done in a constructive manner that looks for
the positive in situations wherever possible. I do not wish to bash for the sake
of bashing.
The State of Defence Blogging today
I am an optimist on the state of defence blogging in the UK and beyond right now. Firstly because there are some brilliant journalists out there who have really begun to engage, and more importantly take measured comments onboard from their twitter followers and put out some great work.
I’d like to highlight the work of the ‘defence crew’ in the form of journalists like (in no order of any kind!) David Willetts, Deb Haynes, Larrisa Brown, Alistair Bunkall, Mark Hookham Jonathan Beale, Francis Tusa, Gareth Corfield and others who are active on Twitter and really engage with their followers. They post stories that don’t always sit well with Defence, but they do so in a way that gets debate flowing – its been a privilege and pleasure to engage virtually with them this year.
There is also a great wider community of sites and individuals like Think Defence, UK Defence Journal, Save the Royal Navy, and also commentators aplenty who have created a great and welcoming environment for defence and national security followers. Twitter is the main driver of hits to this site, so engagement is essential to make it work.
The final bunch of users is the military community – this is a bit mixed. There are some great individuals, often forced to post under pseudonyms or deactivate accounts when they get promoted. Apparently being a senior officer in the armed forces can give you the ability to authorise operations where people get killed, but you can’t be trusted to hit ‘send’ on a tweet without a lengthy approval chain. It would be great if more people from Defence could use twitter in a personal capacity, not merel;y the (very good) PR hits that come out.
Part of the challenge seems to be getting inside the OODA loop and getting interesting content and rebuttal online quickly. HMS ENTERPRISE really nailed it, and HMS PROTECTOR is good too – as is HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH (and Ships Cat) at setting the outline of what they are up to and then informing people about the fabulous work of the armed forces.
But what would be great would be for the MOD to be far more supportive of the ‘thinking culture’ and the ‘challenge culture’ and let people tweet anonymously in a private capacity without them being in fear of their livelihood. Too many good people have fallen off twitter, or been punished at work for the crime of expressing a personal point of view in their spare time, and their departure is to the detriment of the debate that this nation needs to have about Defence.
Until the concept of ‘challenge’ is properly bedded in, and it is accepted that this means letting intelligent people at all ranks and rates question appropriately privately and anonymously online, but publicly support in their official capacity, then arguably Defence will fail to have this debate. The more that people try to clamp down on the expression of views that deviate even one iota from officially sanctioned lines, the less it is possible to really make the case for defence in an informed way – how can you debate the merits of capability investments if you are expected to say nothing more than a bland line to take?
The model should be the US Armed Forces, where there is a healthy culture of debate when articles are issued with a rider that ‘it is written in a personal capacity’. Until we reach a stage where people accept that debate is part of the vital DNA that makes up the armed forces, and encourage it and not force people who want to talk proudly and knowledgeably about their livelihood into hiding anonymously online, we are not in a great place.
Access All Areas?
One
thing that has amused me is hearing reports second hand of the manner that this
blog has become of interest to certain parts of the MOD. I am aware that its
credibility has been openly questioned in certain sessions by some very senior
people. The argument seems to be that this blog (and myself) are not in full possession
of the facts, so how can I know what I’m talking about?
I quite
agree that I’m not in possession of the facts. To avoid any doubt, I only blog
on open source material and cite my research and stories where appropriate. I
merely take what is in the public domain and analyse, question and consider it.
A more
pertinent question may be ‘why if I am not in full possession of the facts is
this blog deemed to be credible in the eyes of many in the MOD to the extent
that it is seen as a better source than the MOD official news lines to take’? I
don’t know the answer, nor am I particularly interested in a debate about it.
I’m
just a person who enjoys writing this stuff in my spare time, trying to put
forward my view of how I see the world. There is no secret agenda, there is no
intent to make mischief or to brief lines in by stealth on behalf of certain
people. One of the funniest stories that I’ve heard is that apparently I lunch
with a senior Defence Official on a regular basis who feeds me lines to take on
the story that I’m writing. Not only have I never met the person in question
(nor did I even know who they were when I was asked if this was true), but it
amused (and it parts concerned) me that other individuals in Defence who I have
never met, nor heard of before were keen to make out that somehow, I’m being
kept in the slipstream of the system and am under their control.
For the
avoidance of any doubt, no I do not lunch with defence officials and discuss
this blog. The small number of people in Defence who I see on a regular basis socially who are privy to my blogging identity (all long standing friends and former colleagues) are utterly professional in avoiding
any discussion with me about material that I am no longer allowed to be privy
to. To be utterly clear -This blog is an independent site with no links
of any kind to the MOD or the British Armed Forces.
One issue
I feel needs to be addressed is ‘who am I’ and the relentless quest in some
quarters to work out who I am. The reason this concerns me is not the efforts
by some organisations to try and spot who ‘Humphrey’ is (and so far it sounds
like many places have been completely and utterly wrong on that front!), but
the pressure put on people who ‘may know me’ to name me. If you want to know
who I am, then please do not force people who may, or may not, know me in to a
situation where you want them to name me. That is wrong on several levels. I
find the level of efforts put into working out my identity in some quarters quite disturbing.
I wish it would stop.
Next Steps?
This
blog will continue to focus on its core offer of providing occasional (usually
weekly but sometimes more) thoughts and comments on the defence news of the
day. I sometimes don’t write about things where I feel I don’t have enough
grounding in the subject to comment knowledgably. In other areas I try to avoid
being sucked into the ‘fantasy fleet’ like debates of theoretical ORBATS (nothing
personal, its just I find it an incredibly dull subject to discuss).
There
is no rhyme or reason to what I write – it depends on my spare time at home,
the demands of a busy real life and of course what is in the news that day. I tend
not to reply to comments posted on the blog more because I’m a bit remiss in
checking them so often don’t see them till long after the debate is closed.
Twitter is the best place to reach me, or via the site email – pinstripedline@gmail.com – I’m
always happy to take emails from people.
I never
set out for this site to be anything other than a repository of my thoughts,
and I am very moved to hear how so many people enjoy it and get pleasure from
reading it. Thank you for all your support, kind words and help over the last
year. Its been a turbulent and challenging year in the real world, and writing
this blog has really helped me through a personally challenging period. Many
readers have become friends in real life, and I’m very proud of the informal
defence twitterati network that has sprung up for prolific defence commentators
who enjoy the odd glass of wine.
This
blog will always be a champion of UK defence and try to work to contextualise
to the best of my understanding what is going on, put the positive case on why
things are happening and set out why things are happening the way they do. I
suspect that over time my ability to remain current, and my understanding will
slip away as new developments happen, and there will come a point where my
ability to comment with knowledge or background is diminished beyond the point
of credibility. I do not wish to be ‘disgusted of Tunbridge Wells’ or ‘Outraged
of the West Indies’. The day will come when I choose to step away from blogging
for this, or other personal reasons. But that is not today.
Many
thanks, and here is to more blogging for as long as it is appropriate to do so.
Happy 1st birthday, Sir Humphrey, and lets hope there are a few more celebrations to come. I don't always agree with what you write but I have always found your blog posts are well worth reading.
ReplyDeleteHappy anniversary, I don't always agree with what you say, but it's always well written and well argued, which enriches what can sometimes be a sterile and repetitive social media environment.
ReplyDeleteHere's to many more posts.
Your blog and the others mentioned are essential in today's modern media. The newspapers and even the BBC have degraded their factual news analysis to such an extent that it is effectively worthless. They seek to be part of the modern social media world and "set agendas" rather than accurately report facts and figures.The danger is that voters and politicians react to these "soundbites" as facts e.g. two new huge aircraft carriers and no planes to fly off them, still quoted by some MPs! Commentators such yourself are now critical to a free media and be the true "reporters" of facts and counterbalance all the other media nonsense.
ReplyDeleteHappy birthday, very much enjoy your articles for their clear analysis and balance.
ReplyDelete