OPERATION SHARPSHOOTER - A very public secret mission.
In February 1996 a Russian VICTOR III nuclear submarine
entered the Norwegian Sea on an unknown mission. The Cold War may have ended,
but NATO remained alert to any potentially hostile submarine in its waters. Tracked
by the Norwegians, the VICTOR began moving towards UK waters, and as a result the
decision was taken to commence OPERATION SHARPSHOOTER.
The goal of the operation was to allow the UK to monitor and
covertly track the submarine to understand its presence and mission and gather
invaluable intelligence on the vessel without giving away the British presence.
Yet in a most remarkable turn of events, this was a mission that ended with the
Royal Navy embarking personnel onboard the VICTOR at sea…
![]() |
| Crown Copyright |
OP SHARPSHOOTER was like previous operations carried out over many years to monitor and track the Russians. In 1995 alone, Operations SYDNEY, PORRINGER and PADBURY were mounted for similar reasons – to find, track and monitor the submarine and understand its mission.
The mission began in February when the Integrated Underwater
Surveillance System (IUSS) identified the target – this was the successor to SOSUS
and provided NATO with the ability to identify and track naval vessels of
interest. The Royal Navy identified that the submarine was an “elusive
target” but IUSS was able to hold “intermittent contact” throughout
the operation.
As the VICTOR moved closer to UK waters, the decision was
taken to deploy Nimrod patrol aircraft to monitor and track its deployment –
working closely with the IUSS data, the RAF played a key role in tracking the submarine.
This was a classic task for Nimrod, which spent many decades operating across
the Atlantic finding and detecting Soviet SSNs.
The decision was also taken to deploy a Royal Navy SSN to
covertly monitor the situation – in this case HMS TRENCHANT was taken off her planned
programme to covertly deploy into a position where working with IUSS and the
RAF, she could monitor the situation. By all accounts the Russian boat was
competently operated, making it hard to identify and track – despite this, TRENCHANT
reported that she had been able to covertly track the Russian vessel on at least
two occasions.
Due to wider programme challenges, the decision was taken to
pull her off task and replace her with her sister ship HMS TALENT, as well as
the Type 22C and Type 23 frigates HMS CAMPBELTOWN and MONMOUTH deployed. These
escorts had Towed Array sonar, and were the pinnacle of British cold war ASW
platforms – highly capable and designed to find and kill Soviet submarines in
the third Battle of the Atlantic. Again the VICTOR was hard to find, and only
MONMOUTH reported tracking her, holding a “brief contact”.
| HMS TRENCHANT Crown Copyright |
The mission continued throughout February, with the Royal Navy and RAF working hard to covertly track the VICTOR, without compromising their own position. It was a classic throwback to cold war era ‘cat and mouse’ games between the hunter and the hunted. Normally the VICTOR would have departed the area, or completed its mission, enabling the British units to come off task, but without either side ever setting an eye on each other. A secret mission conducted far from land and without a word exchanged between the two sides.
All this changed on 29 February when the Russian Embassy
urgently contacted the MOD to ask for help. A crewman onboard the VICTOR was
seriously ill and urgently required medical assistance – could the Royal Navy
help? There is an ancient and time honoured tradition that ensures sailors
render aid to sailors, regardless of nation or politics. It was agreed that
yes, the UK would come to the help of the Russian sailor.
An RAF Nimrod from 201Sqn was dispatched to the location
given by the Embassy, encountering the submarine some 90 miles northwest of Cape
Wrath. At the same time the Type 42 destroyer HMS GLASGOW, participating in a Joint
Maritime Course (JMC), which was a major UK led naval exercise off the west
coast of Scotland was tasked with conducting a Search & Rescue operation.
GLASGOW was sent with all due haste to an agreed rendezvous point,
arriving at 1520 in the afternoon of the 29th. There was some
confusion at this stage, with the
GLASGOW arriving at coordinates given by the Russians, yet the VICTOR was
nowhere to be seen. The RAF Nimrod began a surface search, perhaps the most
unusual search that the Nimrod ever had to carry out for a Russian submarine,
and in turn found the vessel surfaced some 12 miles from the agreed
location. This was a remarkable turn of
events – for weeks the RN had been spending long hours trying to find and then covertly
stalking this submarine, taking every effort not to hint at their presence.
Suddenly she was on the surface and waiting to receive help from the Royal
Navy.
With the location confirmed, GLASGOW deployed her Lynx helicopter,
which closed with the VICTOR and transferred a winchman and the PO Medical Assistant
onto the deck. This was probably the first time that Royal Navy crew had ever
joined a Russian nuclear submarine at sea. The intent was to offer medical
assistance and if needs be evacuate the patient for more medical help ashore.
It was discovered that the Russian sailor was suffering from
serious complications with his appendix – although the POMA was surprised to
note that “the Russian medical officer had operated on the patient 24 hours
earlier, but had not removed the appendix”. The decision was taken to evacuate
the sailor, who was then transferred to the Lynx and from there via Sea King to
the Western Isles, where an operation was carried out to treat an abscess on
his appendix.
The patient made a swift recovery, supported by an RAF linguist
who spoke Russian, and who provided translation services until the Russian
embassy could dispatch a member of staff to support the sailor.
The sense from the Royal Navy was that this was a genuinely successful
operation: “The regular and cordial communications between GLASGOW,
the Nimrod and the submarine gave the impression that the Russians were very
grateful for our assistance.”
During this period OP SHARPSHOOTER was suspended, however once
the mercy mission was complete, the operation resumed. The challenge for the
British was what was the purpose of the Russian deployment? In a note to
Ministers, the MOD stated:
“The VICTOR III’s intentions are not known but
possibilities include waiting to join up with the KUZNETZOV group
returning from the Mediterranean (due out in the first week of March);
conducting an ASW patrol to the west of the UK; returning north to conduct
surveillance of Exercise BATTLE GRIFFIN off the Norwegian Coast; or,
conducting surveillance of JMC 961. Operation SHARPSHOOTER
recommenced shortly after the VICTOR III dived.”
The simple fact was that the UK wasn’t clear on what the
VICTOR was up to, or where she would go next. Much like the Royal Navy and
other NATO nations monitored Soviet exercises during the Cold War, it was
likely that the Russians were doing the same thing, attempting to gain
intelligence collection opportunities while remaining undetected.
One of the notable points of concern for the MOD was the
media coverage of the event – it turns out that a journalist had been covertly
monitoring RAF emergency channels including the conversations between the Nimrod
and UK stations and had “drawn unhelpful conclusions”. The story of
concern is likely to have been in the Herald, and it can still be viewed
online.
“But even in the circumstances of the medical emergency,
the Russians tried to hide the fact that they were on an intelligence-gathering
mission. The submarine gave co-ordinates for a rendezvous 90 miles north of the
Isle of Lewis.
It then slipped away from the exercise it had been
shadowing undetected for several days and headed out of the area at high speed,
taking the patient almost 70 miles away from his rescuers before surfacing.
However, its 30-knot burst of speed allowed it to be
picked up and tracked by sonar dropped from an RAF Nimrod maritime surveillance
aircraft scrambled from RAF Kinloss. Before that, it had evaded helicopter and
other sonar sweeps.”
HMS MONMOUTH & TRENCHANT Crown Copyright
The end results of OP SHARPSHOOTER are not known, although it doubtless provided valuable information. What was notable though is the response from the Russians to the Royal Navy, who seemed to be genuinely grateful for their support.
On the 4th of March 1996, the Russian CINC
Admiral Gromov chaired a meeting in Moscow, at an event to mark the 300th
anniversary of the Russian Navy. It was attended by foreign attaches, senior Russian
officers and TV crews. Before it began, Gromov departed from the planned script
to brief all present about the rescue, and to make a very public declaration of
thanks to the Royal Navy for its help.
In a note from the Naval Attache to London, it was stated
that:
“This was a very high profile gesture at a very public
gathering. after the briefing NA gave a short tv interview giving a bulletin on
the patient’s condition received from the hospital orally before. during
discussion with RNS personnel after the meeting it became apparent that it had
been an agonising decision and the patient which accounts for the frustrations
experienced by all those trying to help. clearly Gromov decision to make the
best of it, remarking after handing over the letter that he was “not sure that
we would continue to work together to preserve safety and security on the seas
unquote”.
In other words, the decision to save the young sailors life
was taken at the highest levels, but also reflected the operational concerns of
the Russian Navy. Should they save a sailor, or preserve the operational
security of their mission. This may reflect why the VICTOR appeared where she shouldn’t
have been and there was confusion about the actual rendezvous location – it would
have been akin to the RN surfacing an SSN off Murmansk and asking for Russian
assistance.
The NA went on to note that:
“The RN is already held in the highest esteem by the Russians.
events like this, handled in such an altruistic and capable manner, can only
reinforce this regard. bravo zulu to all concerned”.
In the days that followed the Russians sent a formal note to
the 1st Sea Lord, Admiral Sir Jock Slater from Admiral Gromov thanking
the UK for its help. Given that only a few years previously the Russian and
Royal Navy were mutually prepared to go to war against each other, it marks a
remarkable change of tone:
“Dear Admiral
On behalf of the Navy and myself I would like to express
sincere gratitude for the help given by the Royal Navy when saving the life of
the Russian sailor-submariner.
The rescue operation conducted by the British military
sailors proves once again the truth that the sea does not separate, but unites
our sailors and our Navies.
I would like to take this opportunity to send our
gratitude to the Commanders and crews of the destroyer “GLASGOW” and the
helicopter “Sea Hawk” for the rescue operation.
I would like to express hope that we will always find
mutual understanding in the future.
Admiral, I would like to wish you success in your
important work, good health and prosperity.”
What makes this letter and wider situation even more extraordinary
is that in the weeks prior, the Russians had been making formal complaints to
the UK about how the RAF Nimrods had been harassing the ADMIRAL KUZNETZOV as
she transited the Channel. Despite this, the Russians were willing to risk it
all for one of their sailors, which speaks to how much better the Anglo-Russian
relations were in the mid 1990s than they are today.
The sailor is known to have made a full recovery, while the
VICTOR 3, known as the ‘TAMBOV’ remains in service to this day. The Russian account
of the story is rather different to the British version – with one
website stating:
“During NATO naval exercises, after a successful
simulation of enemy detection, an undetected Russian submarine contacted NATO
ships, asking for help. Soon, in the middle of the NATO formation, a submarine
surfaced, identified by British sailors as a Project 971 Shchuka-B. One of the
crew members needed indeed urgent medical care due to peritonitis, after an
appendectomy. The submariner was taken to the British destroyer HMS Glasgow,
and from there, flown to the nearest hospital by a Westland Lynx. The British
press covered this, the Times noted that it was a demonstration of the VICTOR
III stealth as none of the NATO ship was able to detect her prior to surfacing,
but it was mis-identified as a Shchuka-B.”
Finally, one of the most remarkable parts of the story is
that the rescue attempt was filmed by the Russians. There is a 3
minute film available on the internet, which was taken by Russian crew
showing the approach of HMS GLASGOWs Lynx, the discussions with the medics and
the evacuation of the crewman. Of note is later footage which seems to show potentially
a Type 22C, through what could be the VICTORs periscope. While this cannot be
proven beyond reasonable doubt, the footage does appear to be genuine and is a
remarkable visual record of a most unusual encounter between the two navies
during OPERATION SHARPSHOOTER.
.jpg)
Comments
Post a Comment