Sir Winston Churchill and the 1960s Ultra Security Breach
In 1960 the Joint Intelligence Committee found itself with
an unexpected problem. Among the challenges of the Cold War and attempting to
predict what the Soviet Union may attempt next, it was also identified that the
content of some of Sir Winston Churchills papers, then under transfer to
the Archives was potentially about to cause a major
diplomatic incident with the USA. This led to urgent ‘action this day’ to
resolve the matter. This is the previously untold story of the Churchill
papers.
Like many leaders, Churchill accrued a significant amount of
files governing his personal life, as well as records of his time in public
office. To this day they remain accessible via the ‘Churchill Archives’ which stores
thousands of papers linked to his time in public office including as Prime
Minister during the 2nd World War (known as the ‘Chartwell Papers’)
and also the later period of his life after July 1945 (known as the ‘Churchill
Papers’). The Chartwell Papers contain
files relating from 1884 until 1945, covering practically every aspect of his
personal and professional life from speeches to personal correspondence to
family and friends.
![]() |
© Crown copyright, |
After Churchill left office in 1945, the records relating to
his time in Government were held by three different organisations. This
included the Chartwell Trust, the Cabinet Office and No10 Downing Street. These
records were mostly innocuous, and while fascinating on one level, giving an
insight into his life and thinking, there was little controversial about them.
The challenge though came in 1960 when it became clear that there was more to
the archives content than had perhaps been realised…
The story of the breaking of the Enigma code remains one of
the most incredible stories of allied cooperation and success in WW2. It was
also for many decades one of the most closely guarded secrets of the war. The
fact that the allies had been able to read Axis message traffic and use it to
their advantage remained incredibly sensitive for years afterwards – in part
because the methods and techniques used continued to form the basis of post war
SIGINT collection by GCHQ and the NSA.
The problem was that public records in the UK can usually be
released to the National Archives (then known as the Public Records Office)
after 30-50 years. In the 1950s and 1960s there was growing concern that this
could potentially jeopardise the Enigma secret. In a letter to the JIC from
GCHQ dated July 1960 on the subject of the security of WW2 SIGINT , it was
noted that: “We have been concerned for some time with the effect for the
regulations of placing documents in the Public Records Office on the security
of files which contain information derived from SIGINT in WW2 and which by
virtue of the passage of time would be candidates for lodging in the PRO”.
It was explained that, in 1948 the UK Joint Intelligence
Committee agreed guidelines to issue to official historians on how to manage
the challenges of writing history documents relating to WW2 and protecting the
enigma secret. In an official paper – JIC(48) 14(0), the JIC advised that:
“Although the war has ended, it is still a vital
necessity that no hint concerning the extent or value of this information be
given. The two main reasons for this are:
a)
Other enemies may arise in the future.
Were they to know what successes were achieved as a result of this special
source, they would ensure that this source is not available to us.
b)
No possible excuse must be given to the
Germans or Japanese to explain away their complete defeat by force of arms.
Knowing that this source of information was available to us would provide such
an excuse”.
This points to the concerns held by the British about the
importance of protecting Enigma, even long after the war was over. It also
points too to the concerns even years after the war ended about changing the
narrative of defeat to one of ‘cheating’. It is hard to remember now, but this
was written barely 3 years after WW2, and 30 years after WW1 ended. It was
clear that attitudes towards former foes had barely begun to soften. In 1956
the JIC again reviewed the subject of what to do with Enigma and wider SIGINT
related material and agreed further guidance to historians that: “No
document giving information of secret intelligence techniques or sources, or
containing any material which would reveal such techniques or sources should
ever be made available to the PRO”. It went on to confirm that even in 1960
there was no intention to declassify Enigma papers and that it was vital that
they be stored appropriately to prevent their release to the PRO.
Churchills papers were seen as a key source of material that
could contain Enigma derived material, and where extra care was needed to
protect them from release – for example ‘indoctrinating’ (reading in)
historians to the enigma secret to make sure they understood the importance of
protecting it, and minimising who could see it. Of itself it is incredible to
think that 15 years after WW2 ended, people were still required to be read into
Enigma and its mysteries. The challenge was that already a leak had occurred
that had caused a minor diplomatic incident...
![]() |
© Crown copyright, |
In 1958 the Cabinet Office was caught up in an embarrassing
breach, when GCHQ had to notify them that a Cabinet Office historian had sent
their opposite number in the USA a copy of Churchills papers which contained
Enigma (then referred to as COMINT) material without knowing the provenance of
the paper and led to the publication of Codeword material in the USA. This was
identified as a major breach of the bilateral BRUSA act, which governed the UK
/ US intelligence sharing relationship, and required GCHQ to take urgent action
to resolve the problem.
Accordingly, the Cabinet Office historians suddenly found
themselves being indoctrinated into Enigma, to understand the importance of
what they were looking at, and why it was so critical to protect it. GCHQ then conducted a sampling exercise of
some of the 516 papers held by the Cabinet Office, selecting 9 at random to see
what they contained. Unfortunately, the results were awkward – As a letter from
GCHQ to the Cabinet Office put it “the finding of 3 wartime COMINT codeword
papers in 9 out of the 516 Churchill files has caused some disquiet at GCHQ”
To resolve this, GCHQ requested that they be able to review all the remaining
files, trying to identify paperwork that may contain Enigma related material.
In turn this would be passed into the custody of the JIC for safe keeping and
study by ‘suitably indoctrinated persons’.
The JIC though had concerns about the handling of the
process and how to protect the long-term national interest. Their concern was
that these files when identified would still need to be weeded to determine if
they were of interest to the PRO, and if so, how to protect them. While it was
possible to protect the documents from release via a ‘Lord Chancellors
Instrument’ which would prevent their release for a while, this would not hold
indefinitely, and GCHQ would need to accept that at some point the files would
become public.
What is interesting at this stage is that in 1960, the view
of the Cabinet Office was that it would take at least 50 years for files to be
handed over to the PRO. As they noted in their letter “under this procedure
WW2 records will not be passed to the PRO until 1989 at the earliest”. It
went on to suggest that to help ensure the files were properly recorded and
understood, that GCHQ should undertake to provide a copy of all WW2 related
SIGINT codewords to help future analysis of files for relevance as “I suggest
this would be better done now before memories fade, as I am sure that this will
be helpful to our successors who will have to grapple with this problem in the
1980s, assuming of course that SIGINT cannot be downgraded after 50 years’!
The JIC went on to note slightly tongue in cheek that due to
the 50-year rule, their head historian (Mr Woods) was concerned with handing
over ‘records of 1910 vintage’ and “unless GCHQ therefore has any
reservation about what can be revealed about SIGINT operations in World War 1,
we can safely relax for the time being. Perhaps you can tell me of any
precautions that should be observed in dealing with WW1 papers”
The GCHQ response was to delicately note that “it seems that the activities and successes of our predecessors have been so widely noted that there is little point in making any special reservation regarding the passing of the WW1 files to the PRO”. Again, it feels incredible looking back to realise that WW1 had ended only 42 years previously, and that when the letter was written, the SIGINT operations of that war were still seen as sensitive.
The GCHQ weeding was successful with 55 documents being
removed from the main files and taken into storage by the JIC. Most of them
contained codewords and material relevant to WW2, but it seems that some
clearly applied to other more current operations, to which the Enigma
indoctrinated historians were not permitted to know. The historian who led the
weeding work had to confess in a memo to showing an Enigma historian a folio
containing a more current Codeword but “fortunately he will no doubt be put
on the current indoctrination list when he joins the JIC secretariat in
January, so I have relaxed”!
This should have been where the story ended, but
unfortunately, events were to take a turn for the worse. In June 1963 GCHQ sent
a letter that began with the delightfully cryptic line “certain regulations
are currently in force to safeguard the Special Intelligence Source which was
exploited so successfully during the 1939-45 war”.
It went on to state that although the JIC held 55 Enigma
related papers in safekeeping, it had been informed by the Cabinet Office that
the Chartwell Trust had passed the papers in its keeping to the PRO for
cataloguing, photographing and then being passed to Randolph Churchill ahead of
his publication of his biography on Sir Winston Churchill. In other words,
after all the efforts to safeguard the Enigma secret by GCHQ, it turned out
that some of the most sensitive COMINT material in the country, that remained
TOP SECRET had been seen and photographed by non-indoctrinated members of what
is now, the National Archives. This was not good news to put it mildly…
GCHQ reviewed the files held by the Chartwell Trust and
identified that in total some 12 papers containing Enigma material had been
seen by the PRO. It also stated that:
“The Chartwell Trust papers also reveal that:
a)
The close association between of the UK
Security Service with the Eire Special Branch during the War;
b)
The Drop Copy arrangements for collection of
cables from the German embassy in Dublin.
Of a) Churchill wrote to the effect: “I never wish to see
this subject again. All copies of this minute is to be destroyed”. The Chartwell
Trust copy is still extant”.
This is noteworthy – the author has been unable to find further information either on MI5 & Special Branch cooperation in WW2, or the Drop Copy arrangements, although the latter strongly implies that the UK was reading German embassy traffic with the active support of the Irish State. In both cases this is a remarkable document to uncover. Of separate note is that GCHQ may have made a mistake - another letter suggests that in fact these files covering "the Irish arrangement" were not included.
![]() |
© Crown copyright, |
The result of these finding was that the Cabinet Secretary
(Sir Burke Trend) was informed, and the decision taken to contact the Chartwell
Trust and have a difficult conversation. The outcome of this was to provide the
Trust with a list of papers that “contained sensitive information of continuing
intelligence value” and recommended that all of them be held in the custody of
the Cabinet Office (e.g. passed into the same JIC storage file).
The biggest issue for debate though was how to remove the
files in the lowest keyway possible. The worry was that if the files were too
blatantly removed people would notice the gaps in the sequential filing. It was
proposed instead to put a small note, as unobtrusively as possible in the
filing structure, to the effect of saying “Because of the continuing
intelligence value of the information contained in FO/XXX this document has
been removed on the authority of the Trustees of the Chartwell Trust is held in
the the Cabinet Office.”
Given the importance of the situation, the Cabinet Secretary
personally met the Trusts solicitors to explain the situation in 1963 and got
their approval to have the papers removed. The only two stipulations the Trust
placed were firstly that there be a formal receipt for the paperwork, to show
that it was above board, and secondly, in a note to the Cabinet Secretary from
the solicitors handling the case noted that Jock Colville, another trustee and
former PS to Churchill suggested that “I should ask you whether, in say 20
years time or whenever the information disclosed by the documents is no longer
subject to national security, they could be returned to the Trust archives”.
Sir Burke Trend agreed with this request, although as he
wrote to those involved in the case “How long it may be before that happens,
no one can yet say; I think we can only leave it, for the present, for an
indefinite period. But we shall in the ordinary course review the security
classification of the papers from time to time; and you may be sure that we will not overlook the
trustees interest”. Enigma was
formally declassified in the 1970s and fully revealed in the 1990s. It remains
unclear though whether the Chartwell Trust ever did receive their papers back,
or if to this day, in a lonely forgotten safe deep within the JIC, lie yet to
be released papers related to Enigma, their stories yet to be uncovered. Either
way, the story of the final Churchill Enigma papers is a fascinating journey
into the world of post war SIGINT and how even decades after the end of WW2,
Enigma was a secret to be kept at any price.
Having had a Quick Look at the Churchill archives it should be possible to figure out if these documents were ever deposited.
ReplyDeleteFirstly - the text of the notes left in their place is known and the archive is digitised so it would be possible to search for the notes - the approximate number is known from the Trend correspondence.
Secondly there are a series of obsolete catalogues from the 1950’s in the Churchill archives. These can be compared with the digital catalogue.
Thirdly accession data should reveal if further documents were deposited post declassification of the ULTRA secret.