Sailing Into A Storm...
HMS PRINCE OF WALES (PWLS) has reportedly spent more time ‘in
dock’ being repaired for various problems since commissioning than she has
at sea. In the eyes of the media she is a broken ship unable to do her job – is
this accurate or fair or is the picture more complex than portrayed? It is very
easy to look at statistics and reach the assumption that a ship is somehow
broken because she isn’t at sea. It is also easy to look at minor incidents and
assume that these in turn have much bigger impact than the reality of the case.
In the case of PWLS, the real picture is actually more positive than some may
have you believe.
The PWLS is the second ship of the QUEEN ELIZABETH class
aircraft carriers, designed to provide a large platform capable of embarking up
to 40 aircraft and operating globally as required. Displacing some 65,000 tonnes
and some 284m long, she is the joint largest warship ever constructed in the UK
and one of the largest, and most complex, warships on the planet.
![]() |
Image by Ministry of Defence; © Crown copyright 2023. |
She initially sailed for sea trials in late 2019, arriving
in Portsmouth in November 2019 when she was then commissioned (e.g. formally
taken on by the Royal Navy and became an official warship) in December 2019. As
is always the case with modern warships, after they have completed their trials
and formal build, they then undergo a series of ‘capability updates’ to install
changes or new equipment that has been developed since the design was signed
off (in this case many years previously) and ensure that the ship is as up to date
as possible. The intention was always that the first year – 18 months of her
life would be spent on trials, getting the ship up to speed and operational and
helping ensure that she was ready to take on 50 years of tasking. What went
wrong?
In early 2020 she suffered very minor flooding, given more
prominence and attention than it warranted due to sailors filming the flood,
rather than fighting the flood. Although quickly repaired, it gained a lot of
interest and the perception that the ship was ‘broken’. Later in 2020 she
suffered a more serious flood that damaged the electrical cabling in the ship
and meant she was under repair from around October 2020 until April 2021.
These dates are important because on the surface it looks as
though she was undergoing very lengthy repairs. But cast your minds back to 2020/21
and the lockdown imposed by hard-partying Downing Street hypocrites, and you
will remember that for much of this period the UK had effectively ground to a
halt thanks to Covid. It is (thankfully) hard to remember much now about how paralysed
the UK (and wider world) was during this period, but huge swathes of the UK
economy ceased to function while people were kept at home.
It is almost certain that the reason these repairs took so
long was because of covid related challenges, be it restrictions on access to the
ship, for fear of infecting the crew, or just complete disruption in the supply
chain. Like many armed forces across the world, lockdowns had a challenging
impact on the Royal Navy as disruption was imposed on the supply chain and way
of working. It is no surprise that what should have been a relatively straight
forward repair was disrupted for far longer than likely necessary due to these restrictions.
This meant that for much of her early
life the ship and her planned programme of trials, testing and work up was
heavily disrupted due to events entirely outside of her control.
The first key thing to note is that ships alongside are not
always ‘docked for repair’. In the case of PWLS she was alongside due to delays
caused by COVID and also the huge disruption to the wider exercise and
deployment programme in 2020 and 21 that led to major challenges. For example
the Carrier Strike Group deployment, although successful had very few actual
port visits for much of their trip due to the need to adhere to local covid restrictions,
while through 2020 and 21 many other RN ships programmes were changed or
cancelled and deployments kept to a minimum.
The second point to note is that ships alongside can be
doing maintenance and not repairs. There is perhaps a lack of understanding
about how complicated ships are, how much time and effort is required in
preventative maintenance to ensure that vastly complex ships can do the job
expected of them and that this can, and does, require time in port to ensure
things are working as planned. When you look at how complicated the CVF platform
is – fundamentally a floating airfield and ammunition dump, powered by vast
engines and full of radars, electronics and weaponry to direct and fight a war
with, as well as life support for the population of a small town, you realise
that this means a lot of things have to work well together to ensure everything
works properly. This level of complexity means that all warships have planned
maintenance periods to help ensure that everything works as planned and that when
the ships go to sea, they do so in the knowledge that their systems should be
up to date and working.
![]() |
Image by Ministry of Defence; © Crown copyright 2023. |
The role of warships is not to spend each and every day at
sea steaming into stormy waters. Ships need time in port, not only to repair
and maintain equipment, but to give their crew a rest, conduct resupply and
also to carry out the minutiae of daily life onboard from defence diplomacy to
taking the rubbish out. This does not mean that a ship isn’t available for sea,
or that in a crisis she couldn’t put to sea, its just that there is no plan for
them to be at sea all the time. This is important partly to give the machinery
a break (operate anything on an enduring basis and it will soon break down for want
of maintenance) but also ensure that the crew have a reasonable home/life
balance too. Keeping people constantly at sea may sound fun or what ‘proper navies’
do, but it also causes immense disruption to family life and can quickly result
in people leaving when the line between ‘reasonable’ and ‘unreasonable’
expectations is crossed. There is no point having an expensive warship if you
have not got the crew to operate it.
So is PWLS broken? At the moment yes she is. In August 2022
the ship put to sea, but for various reasons she seems to have suffered an
issue with her propellor shaft that resulted in her requiring an unplanned
emergency dry docking in Rosyth. At this stage it is fair to say that she is ‘in
dock for repair’ and that these repairs will likely last a couple more months.
She will then return to Portsmouth to enter into a maintenance period – a sensible
decision to ensure that all the constituent parts of the ship work as planned
after several months without being used, and will deploy from there in line
with the plan that the Royal Navy has for her.
The unplanned docking is an uncomfortable story for the RN
as no navy likes it when their ships break down unexpectedly. The thing is though
that ships of all nations have a habit of breaking down unexpectedly – the French
carrier Charles De Gaulle lost her propellor during sea trials, while the USS
FORD has had a long litany of trials and tribulations on her heavily delayed journey
to enter service. Meanwhile the Russian carrier Admiral Kuznetsov seems to
break down every time her hull is exposed to salt water… The point is that
these things do happen, particularly with the most complicated machines ever to
sail the surface of the ocean.
![]() |
Image by Ministry of Defence; © Crown copyright 2023. |
But does this mean that the ship
is now broken and having a significant impact on the Royal Navy? The fact that
last year the QE was able to cover for PWLS by sailing to New York and other
parts of the US was proof of the flexibility of a two carrier force, but it
still caused some disruption to her planned programme. The trials that the PWLS
was due to carry out with the F35 still need to be done, although they will
likely slip to 2023 now. But from an operational perspective although some
trials have been delayed, the impact on the front line operational fleet has
been limited – all along the RN plan has been that PWLS would not be at full
operational capability until 2023, so in practical terms its not really had
an impact (yet) on plans for her employment within the fleet. Although there
will doubtless be some minor slips or delays to plans, the bigger picture means
that this is unlikely to have had as bad an impact as some may think. The
challenge now for the RN is to get the ship ready for sea again by mid-2023 and
then out on tasking as required.
It is unfair then to say that PWLS has spent more of her
time being repaired than at sea, her early years have been marred by a series
of unfortunate incidents that have quickly been repaired. She has had programmes
disrupted due to Covid (like many other ships) and has had only one incident
that has caused significant disruption, which is a problem that is now rapidly
being fixed. The challenge with building aircraft carriers is that you don’t
get to build lots of trial versions then series produce them, you need instead
to build them and trial/test and employ them using the production models – this
means it can take time to iron out the bugs and make sure everything is working
as planned. The ship has a 50 year lifespan and it is worth noting that she will
be extremely hard worked for many decades to come. This period will quickly be forgotten and in
time will be seen as part of the challenge that comes from operating a global
navy with some of the most advanced warships on the planet. If going to sea was
easy, everyone would be doing it – it is a measure of how complex and challenging
this business is that it can take time to be ready to for sea in all respects.
Comments
Post a Comment