Going Dutch? The Value of Bilateral Defence Relationships
Historically the sight of a fleet of Dutch warships sailing
up the Thames is a reason for panic in the UK. Over the centuries some of the
more ‘uncomfortable’ moments of British naval history have occurred as a result
of encounters with the supremely professional and capable vessels and sailors
of the Royal Netherlands Navy. This week though four Dutch warships have visited
London as friends and representatives of one of the UK’s strongest and most
enduring military relationships.
While it is fashionable to focus on the UK’s links to
nations like the USA and other ‘Five-Eyes’ partners, or consider how to thicken
military links in the Indo-Pacific, it is worth reflecting on the strength of
the relationships enjoyed with other partners much closer to home. Some of the
most important defence relationships that the UK enjoys occur with partners in
Europe where joint operations are vital to securing long term British strategic
interests.
The publication of the ‘High
North’ strategy by the MOD sets out the crucial importance of the Arctic
and its surrounding regions to the UK. This document notes the importance of
working closely with partners such as Norway to develop effective joint
operations to ensure the security of the region against a range of complex
threats and challenges. Norway is a particularly close ally of the UK, given the
mutually shared interest in trying to defend the North Sea, and in monitoring a
vast area of sea and airspace as well as natural resources.
The Cold War mission for the Royal Marines was to deploy to
Norway to help defend it from Soviet invasion, and in the process helped the RM
become a leading arctic warfare operator, able to operate and fight in the snowy
wilderness of northern Norway. Lessons learned here proved of vital importance during
the 1982 Falklands War, and to this day the RM, plus supporting amphibious
ships and aircraft continue to spend large amounts of the year working in the
bleak and unremittingly hostile arctic environment.
In the process Norway has become a close military partner, providing
logistical support and facilities that help UK training, while also operating a
range of shared platforms. For example Norway also operates F35 and P8 aircraft
alongside the UK, which raises the opportunity for significant future
cooperation in both air defence and long range maritime patrol missions, particularly
in the High North. Meanwhile the
Norwegian defence industry offers a range of very capable products on the global
market, and the Royal Navy has now confirmed that it is buying the Naval Strike
Missile, a highly capable anti-ship and land attack missile that will operate from the Type 23 and
45 platforms as a replacement for the venerable Harpoon missile. This bodes
well for future deeper cooperation between the two nations.
This is a good example of the sort of effective defence
partnership that the UK can enjoy with likeminded partners where there are shared
issues of concern and common ground to work together on. The fact that the UK
and Norway will be joint operators of aircraft like the P8 points to a future
of increasingly effective joint ASW work in cold and remote waters, while the
renewed cooperation for arctic warfare training means that the UK will not only
be able to assist Norway, but also continue to maintain and expand its ability
to work in this critical area. As the polar regions become of ever greater
strategic interest and competition, being able to work and operate in them is
of increasing importance, and being able to do so with capable allies is vital.
![]() |
Image by Ministry of Defence; © Crown copyright 2023. |
Another crucial ally for the UK is the Netherlands,
particularly the maritime links with the Royal Netherlands Navy. Both nations
have shared and very similar strategic perspectives, with a strong interest in continental
security and stability in Europe, but also have a much wider international
perspective (the Netherlands for example continues to have territories in the
Caribbean). With both nations having capable and competent armed forces, and a
political willingness to deploy them in higher risk environments, the UK-NL
partnership is a good example of where joint cooperation can be extremely
beneficial.
For example the UK-NL Amphibious force is now over 50 years
old and represents one of the most truly integrated and effective amphibious
forces in the world. Intended to be used in Norway, and now more widely able to
operate around the world, the force is a good way to bring together British and
Dutch forces in one organisation – this is ideal for international peacekeeping
deployments, NEO’s or warfighting, when the joint nature of the force means it
is easy to ‘plug and play’ together. The presence of a Dutch amphibious landing
ship in the Thames this week reminds us that the RM can, and does, regularly embark
onboard these ships to help practise joint operations together.
This is but one part of a close naval relationship (by contrast the Dutch air force builds close links with the US, while the Army has a close link to Germany) which is also manifested in sea training, where for over 60 years RNLN vessels have been training at FOST (over 168 Dutch ships have now been trained by this organisation) and in joint submarine work too. While the Royal Navy has never built a joint vessel design with the Dutch (despite some previous efforts), the two nations ships can, and do, work regularly together on a very effective basis. For example the RNLN sent a frigate to participate as a fully integrated part of the CSG21 deployment (HNLMS Evertsen), who brought both significant capabilities and a very professional crew to the trip. That the RN felt confident enough to fully integrate a Dutch warship into its carrier strike group speaks volumes about the strength of the relationship that exists.
There is huge value to be gained for the UK from being a peer partner to very capable armed forces like the Netherlands or Norway, because it has significantly more influence and ability to shape outcomes. While the links with the US are central too, and deeply important for UK interests, the UK will always be a ‘bit player’ in the sense that the scale of its contribution will be dwarfed by US participation. By contrast working with partners like Norway or the Netherlands results in a partnership of equals, particularly when both countries operate identical equipment at similar scales. There is real long-term value to be had from working to foster and grow links with peer partners because it can pay dividends to longer term security.
A good example of this is the recent decision to jointly
develop the next generation fighter aircraft with Japan and Italy – a move that
will see the UK work equally with two different partners to bring advanced
aircraft into service. All three nations enjoy the benefits of having similar
strategic interests, advanced aerospace capabilities and good relationships
with the USA. This means that ensuring the
release of third party technology from the US to be fitted on the platform
is likely to be relatively straightforward, which in turn increases the
viability of the aircraft.
For the UK the move to develop this platform is a good
reminder of the value of long-term investment and engagement in defence and
security globally. To get two of the worlds key economic powers to be willing
to work with you to take forward this project requires a lot of effort to build
credible defence relationships and develop trust to the point where nations are
willing to share their most advanced science and technology with you. This cannot
be done from scratch, and we should perhaps see this agreement as a good
outcome from many years of shared engagement both in the Med and Indo-Pacific
region, with the UK showing that it is willing to deploy into, work alongside
and be seen as a peer partner. This move is a very positive development, and
one that will generate long term industrial opportunities for the UK. While it
may sometimes be easy to be cynical about the long term value of defence
engagement, it is clear that it’s not only good to talk, but also highly profitable
too…
Brought together, the UK has benefitted from being able to
build and nurture a series of highly valuable defence relationships across NATO
with peer allies. The result of investing time and effort in this is not only
better cooperation on areas of mutual security, such as the High North, but
access to high quality training opportunities (like Arctic Warfare training)
and also develop links that result in high quality assets like major warships
being attached to the Carrier Strike Group for global deployments. For the UK
this sort of engagement generates enormous benefits, while also helping build and
improve international security too. It is without doubt a ‘win win’ situation.
Comments
Post a Comment