A Great Week To Be A British Sailor...
It has been a very good week for the
Royal Navy, which has seen the confirmation of plans to order three Future
Support Ships and five Type 26 frigates have been placed on contract for
construction. This news cements a very substantial future work package for the
next 10 years at least, and provides both certainty and long term stability for
the UK shipbuilding industry.
The Type 26 order is good news for
several reasons. Firstly it provides confirmation that the RN will see out the
full construction of this class of ship, with 8 hulls entering service between
the late 2020s and mid 2030s. These will be in addition to large orders from
both the Royal Australian and Canadian Navy for the design, which will become
one of the most numerous and capable Western ASW frigates of the next decade.
Its not just the Type 26 order that
is good news here – the placing of contract of all 8 hulls means that thanks to
earlier orders for the Type 31 frigate, no less than 13 frigates are committed
to construction in the UK right now. This is one of the largest naval
construction programmes in NATO and will help ensure a 100% refresh of the
Royal Navy’s frigate force over the next decade, providing it with some of the
most modern and capable warships on the planet.
At the same time the decision to
select the FSS design and proceed towards contract award early in 2023 is
incredibly important. The FSS design is central to ensuring that the Royal Navy
can continue to operate globally with its own integral support and supplies –
these ships are effectively a combination of floating supermarket and gun shop,
providing everything from food, fuel, spare parts and munitions to help keep
ships at sea for longer. Without them Task Groups become reliant on shore ports
for support, making them far less able to conduct ‘blue water’ operations.
Currently there is only one vessel in
the RN capable of this task – RFA FORT VICTORIA, a 30yr old supply ship.
Without doubt this is the ‘weak link in the anchor’ in that as an older
singleton hull, she urgently needs replacing to be certain that the RFA can
support the carrier groups ambition as well as wider global deployments. It is
vital that these ships enter service as planned to prevent any disruption to Royal
Navy operations around the world.
The build solution will incorporate
both construction at home, parts built in Spain and a combined assembly in the
UK to create a British ship, built by British workers in a British port. Some
will moan (and indeed are moaning) that this choice hurts opportunities for UK
workers. While it is the case that parts of the ship will be built abroad, this
is a UK design, built and assembled in the UK to ensure that it meets our
standards. Plenty of other navies rely on foreign yards for elements of
construction, and if this is a means of affording three hulls, rather than two,
then that is a good trade off.
There is a delicate balancing act to
be struck here – there will always be calls to build ships in the UK for
British workers, but there also needs to be a credible construction programme
to deliver a credible design on time and not be late. The award here fuses both
support for UK yards, helping them continue to design and build specialist
military equipment, as well as jobs, while still being affordable. The
likelihood is that when these ships enter service, there will be follow
on orders of some form for other RFA platforms to follow, so this is
potentially building an extra line of work for many years to come for yards linked
to the RFA.
The danger of saying ‘but why not
make it purely British built’ is that there is only finite yard capacity in the
UK, and only so many organisations able to deliver the ships. With the military
shipbuilding yards at full stretch, there is realistically only so many places
that could bid to build these ships. There is also a cost issue – it is likely
that a UK bid would have been so much more expensive that only two ships, not
three would have been ordered, a bad result both for the Taxpayer and Royal
Navy.
In an integrated global economy, we
need to ensure that the UK can show itself as a global exporter of vessels. By
creating the condition to deliver these ships efficiently and on budget, there
is a chance that other navies may order similar vessels in due course, and the tantalising
prospect of a build strategy for follow on RFA’s in years to come. We are
getting dangerously close to an integrated national shipbuilding strategy being
delivered in practise, not just on paper.
There is doubtless difficult decisions
to come – the ships need to be built to a speedy timescale to ensure all three
are in service within 10 years – but even more importantly is the need to
replace RFA FORT VICTORIA asap. At the same time they need to survive the inevitable
budget cuts that loom as a flat growth defence budget contends with large
inflation and real terms cuts, and also ensure that the RFA is able to get
sufficient personnel to sea to crew these ships at a point when many of its
most experienced personnel will have retired. There are challenges to come, but
today is a time of relief and good news.
No less than 11 British warships and auxiliaries
have been ordered or put into a point when they will be ordered this week, and
this is coming on the back of the decision to progress with two MROS platforms earlier
this month. More British military vessels have been ordered or committed to
this month than for many years previously combined – it is by any measure, a
great day to be a sailor!
Great article and also to add that Harland & Wolf plus Appledore ship yards are saved and given a new lease of life!
ReplyDeletehttps://thinpinstripedline.blogspot.com/2017/08/to-sink-story-royal-navy-and-harpoon.html?m=1
ReplyDelete"The Harpoon has been an excellent capability for the last 30 years, but like all weapon systems it will need to retire. The RN has been forced to make really difficult choices over funding and chosen to prioritise other systems instead. Don’t forget that under the operating model that Defence uses now, if the RN felt a Harpoon replacement was that important, then NAVY command could have chosen to reprioritise funding from their budget to make it happen. That they did not should tell you a great deal about the importance the RN places on Harpoon right now, and the even greater importance of prioritising the right replacement in due course, not the halfway house tomorrow. "