Monarchs of the Sea
HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH has returned to Portsmouth from her sea
trials in the Atlantic, a voyage that saw her make the first of many visits to
Gibraltar, and help continue the complicated process of making sure the ship is
able to safely, efficiently and effectively operate aircraft. The purpose of trials is simple, to make sure that things
work as intended and then if not, work out what to do to make them work
properly. While it is understandable that many frustrated commentators want to
see jets embarked yesterday, when you bring a ship into service for the first
time, you have to be certain it all works properly.
![]() |
Image by Ministry of Defence; © Crown copyright |
These trials are particularly important in setting the
parameters of how the ship works, understanding the limitations of aviation operations
and in seeing how the vessel handles in varied weather conditions. The Save the
Royal Navy website has a good account of some of the work done to date - LINK
HERE To date, according to the 2nd Sea Lord (whose twitter feed
@VAdmJWoodcock is very good indeed), she
has conducted over 1000 aircraft landings. Launching aircraft on a flat calm mill pond may be one
thing, recovering aircraft in an Atlantic storm at night is something totally
different. Until the operators know the limits of the ship, know what can be
done, and more importantly what can’t be done, then it is inherently foolish to
embark squadrons of F35s. Getting the basics right is essential here, to prevent problems downstream.
RAS with the RFA
One of the key parts of the trials is to make sure that
the ship is capable of Replenishment At Sea (RAS) operations. This process is
integral to what distinguishes the Royal Navy as a truly global force, from
many other coastal navies. The ability to stay at sea and take on fuel, supplies
and munitions helps extend reach and influence considerably further than would
otherwise be the case. The Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA) has a long and proud
history of supporting the Royal Navy, providing support and stores across the
globe, with its personnel (officially counted as MOD Civil Servants) delivering
superb service. This force is critical in ensuring the Royal Navy remains able
to deploy globally.
It was essential then for QUEEN ELIZABETH to conduct a
RAS early in her career to make sure that such a process is possible, and safe
to do. You have to be certain when placing a 65,000 tonne aircraft carrier alongside
a nearly 40,000 oil tanker that things will work as intended. That’s before you
start the process of refuelling the ship – akin to trying refuel your car from
a petrol lorry in the motorway while you’re both doing 50MPH.
The trials took place, although as the RN press release
drily notes HERE, bad weather conditions meant the decision was taken to call it
off early. There is some debate as to whether firing lines together counts or not - to Humphrey it is an emphatic yes!
This prompted some derision on social media, with Armchair Admirals
immediately moaning about how ‘well how will they do it in wartime’ or ‘we did
it in the Falklands don’t you know’. This is all well and good, but there is a
difference between doing a RAS, particularly mid way through an operational deployment
when the ships company is worked up, knows the drill and people understand the
limitations, and doing it for the first time.
Sticking two brand new ships together, jointly displacing
over 100,000 tonnes is always going to be a tricky evolution. Watching the
video footage shows just how heavy the sea conditions were – when you see QEC's red
anti fouling paint clear the waterline, you realise how strong they must have
been to cause a Carrier to move in that manner. Continuing an evolution in those
conditions was inherently riskier than breaking off and trying again another
day.
To some this will be evidence of a risk averse navy, not
willing to tolerate anything slightly dangerous. To Humphrey, it is the sign of
a Navy which knows when to take risk, and also when not to take unduly great
risk for no discernible gain. This speaks volumes on the calm, measured
approach to leadership that is instilled in the RN at all levels.
Force Regeneration
The wider ‘good news’ story of this piece though is the
sight of a brand new British Fleet Aircraft Carrier steaming through heavy
seas, with Chinooks tidily lashed down across its flight deck like ants, and preparing to RAS with a brand new British
Fleet Tanker. This is the culmination of years of planning, and significant
investment in research to ensure that it could happen – for example there are
images on social media showing the mock up models of both ships in the trials
pool in Gosport years ago that made sure this would work safely – a great reminder
of the importance of the work of Qinetiq and other civil servants in the Defence
Scientific community and beyond to keep our front line working.
The bringing together of these two programmes heralds a
genuine renaissance in UK maritime capability after a testing few years of gaps
and capability holidays. The loss of the CVS, Harrier and the paying off of
older RFA tankers tested the faith of many, who feared it would sound the death
knell for the future. Yet here we are a few years later with the nucleus of a Carrier
Battle Group at sea, brand new ships able to deploy globally and supported by
the world beating Type 45 and 23s, while the Type 26 is (finally) under
construction and Type 31 contract is now out to tender.
It is an incredibly inspiring moment to look at the photo
of the RAS – it speaks on so many levels about an amazing story of success and
accomplishment. On the one hand it talks of the ability of the UK to deliver
new ships (and in the case of the Tide class to modify them as no UK yards bid
for them due to a lack of capacity in their yards thanks to the large building
programme of the last few years). It shows how the UK can project manage
incredibly complex issues, fusing together civil servants and service personnel
to deliver some of the most complicated and capable machinery on the planet and
manage not just these projects, but many others too. This photo is a testimony to
an astoundingly good procurement system.
At another level the photo acts as a timely reminder that
the Royal Navy is a truly global navy. A carrier practising a RAS in heavy seas
is something only a tiny number of nations can do – the US, the UK and potentially
France (albeit with a much more limited pool of supply ships), and possibly
Russia on a good day. The skill set required to deliver this is substantial,
takes many years to develop and is perhaps a good reminder that becoming a carrier
capable navy requires a lot of investment across many different areas to successfully
deliver.
The final great point about these pictures is that they
beautifully capture the joint manner in which the UK armed forces work now. In
this image you can see RAF Chinooks, integrated as a core part of the airwing
and supported by RAF personnel, MOD Civil Servants in the form of RFA
personnel, and RN and RM personnel too all working together to operate these
ships. This is truly joint operations, and helps remind us that the UK excels at
bringing its individual Services together to be greater than the sum of their
parts.
It may be a small step in a long road, but these photos
capture so much about the renaissance of the Royal Navy, the new equipment
coming into service and its people and their approach to delivery of
capability. There is much more to come, with the next milestone being the embarkation
of jets later in the year, but already it is clear that HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH is
shaping up to be a magnificent monarch indeed.
Without wishing to denigrate DSTL and the defence science community, they had nothing whatsoever to do with the hydrodynamic testing of the ships in the Haslar tanks. Those experiments were the purview of DE&S CS, BMT and QinetiQ.
ReplyDeleteWhere would the Indian Navy be placed when it comes to Replenishment at Sea operations?
ReplyDeleteAlongside each other and going in the same direction... usually.
DeleteG club For those who do not like the computer screen for a long time.
ReplyDeleteG club It is a website for gaming, gaming, computer networking, gaming, and gaming. And to compensate for the desire of the player to the era.
G club website is also available through mobile. For those who do not like to sit on the computer screen for a long time, our website, a gaming application, gambling on smartphones that we are proud of is about to offer. For players who are attached to mobile phones, especially Support both IOS and Android operating system, so do not worry about security. Image and sound are not inferior.
On the site G club. You do not have to worry about the lack of access to gaming, gambling, and even playing anywhere, anytime, at home, at work or anywhere. 3G 4G or flammable, it can be used, whether it is a network, all networks are available. Do not wait, hurry to join the fun ดาวน์โหลด gclub.
Some common sense as a counter narrative to the spreadsheet analysts and civilians: http://lindleyfrench.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/why-royal-marines-are-in-danger.html#comment-form
ReplyDeleteAnd it is unfortunately true that some do think that it’s sensible to order an aircraft carrier (capital asset with 1700+ souls ) into harm’s way (shallow water, might be mined, cant manoeuvre, in range of land based missiles, easy to target what is not hiding at sea) in order to deploy marines on shore!!! Instead of using HMS Ocean, HMS Albion and HMS Bulwark to make a bridge head under the protection of carrier based aircraft.
Not too long ago, the Russians demonstrated the capacity to deploy 9000 troops and 600 tanks into Ukraine supported with Buk-9M38 missiles that also downed a MH17 Malaysian Airliner.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pU3KluWRkg
When an SDR is launched by a UK government, the objective, context and narrative are advanced according to - Cost savings / automation / process efficiency / more for less – it sounds like a business school lecture – Generals of old would have had their heads, for this is not the language of strategy.
It’s also got nothing to do with the growing size and capability of the Russian military, when the only apparent thing that is important, is what the PRESS say and how much a platform COSTS to build and maintain. Protecting UK ship yards / engineering expertise / strategic assets is of little long term interest for MPs who think that ships get designed and built in less than five years.
Fighting rear guard action after successive rear guard SDR action in peace time, is tiring and is something that emboldens a prospective enemy – (Argentina not withstanding taught the UK a lesson in life’s and ships lost, in appearing to not be interested in maintaining the navy – Ref John Nott).
Tailored Quote: ST
There are three ways in which a ruler can bring misfortune upon his army/navy/air force:
• By commanding the navy to advance or to retreat, being ignorant of the fact that it cannot obey. This is called hobbling the navy/RAF.
• By attempting to govern a navy in the same way as he administers a kingdom, being ignorant of the conditions which obtain in the navy. This causes restlessness in the soldiers/sailors/pilots minds.
• By employing the officers of his navy without discrimination, through ignorance of the military principle of adaptation to circumstances. This shakes the confidence of the soldiers/sailors/pilots.
Russia have stable ship / fighter aircraft / tank building programs; the UK has political soft power and a defence budget that is inadequate to maintain the current capability gaps (just lost HMS Ocean). Credibility / capability gaps that are a form of financial defence budget gambling, that have been exposed by Russian military interventions into UK air / sea space over the last several years.
Tupolev Tu-95 Bear bomber
Tupolev-160 Blackjack bomber
Tupolev Tu-142 Bear F/J bomber
Admiral Kuznetsov (aircraft carrier)
Vice-Admiral Kulakov (Udaloy-class destroyer)
Severomorsk (Udaloy-class destroyer)
Yaroslav Mudry (Neustrashimy-class frigate)
Akula-class submarines
Having to call on foreign governments to protect UK waters and air space demonstrates a lack of vision, planning in equipment procurement or personnel retention / training; how should one sugar coat this, when walking into the next SDR?
Keith Sware