The Falkand Islands Conflict - 40 Years On
On
02 April 1982 Argentinean forces invaded the Falkland Islands, and following a
brief but bloody battle, defeated the small Royal Marine garrison and took
control of the islands. 73 days later they in turn surrendered to a British
task force who liberated the islanders. 255 British and 694 Argentineans were
killed along with 3 Falkland Islanders.
We
are now roughly as far from the Falklands War as the war was from the battle of
Alamein, a reminder of the passage of time. Forty years later and the war feels
as if it is passing into history, yet it deserves to be remembered properly.
There
is a clear parallel here with the situation in Ukraine, where a nation that has
chosen to live independently and made clear it does not wish to be part of
greater Russia has been invaded and finds itself under attack from troops led
by a dictator who does not speak for his nation.
For
decades the test for UK defence policy in media articles has been ‘defence cuts
mean that the Royal Navy / Armed Forces could not retake the Falklands’ as if a
pure numbers based comparison means that the UK is doomed. It has become very
much a mantra that if ships or aircraft are scrapped, the islands themselves are
at risk.
This
has ignored the reality that British defence policy for the last 40 years has
been built around not losing the islands again in the first place, leading to
the maintenance of an extensive garrison and highly credible defensive
facilities in the islands. The chances of an Argentine military, which has been
systematically starved of funds for many years having any opportunity to mount
a credible threat to the security of the islands is at the very edge of
credibility.
The
first lesson we can draw is that the war we fought 40 years ago is not the war
we will fight now. The equipment, technology and tactics are so utterly
different as to be beyond meaningful comparison. Comparing the two periods is no
different to looking at the armed forces of WW2 and 1982 and assessing the outcome
(arguably an easier task given the plethora of WW2 era equipment used by
Argentina in the war).
The second
thought is that the UK finds itself in a curious quandary – there is no
credible military threat from Argentina, but the actions of the Argentine government
does not lead to an environment where the already low key defensive posture can
easily be reduced further. The constant efforts by Argentine leaders linked to
Kirchner to push the islands cause as a distraction from their catastrophic mismanagement
of the Argentine economy is unhelpful in building positive relationships.
Whether
the UK wishes it or not, the Falklands remain a core defence commitment because
of the unpredictability of the current Argentine leadership, who seem determined
to undo years of progress in building closer links. It is a sad reflection that
only five years ago HMS PROTECTOR and HMS CLYDE and the Royal Air Force were
deeply involved in searches for the missing ARA SAN JUAN, helping further relationships,
yet today at a political level one is left with the sense that the current Argentine
Government prefers cheap shots, verbose diplomacy and a desire to burn bridges to
deflect attention from their burning economic car crash.
Helping
deescalate the region really calls for a stable and predictable engagement
which recognises that as nations there is disagreement, but seeking to move
past this to a point where it is recognised, but is not an impediment to
positive collaboration across so many other strands of work. Sadly the current
governments desire to weaponise this dispute for internal purposes feels like this
will not be possible.
A wider lesson from 1982 applied to today is the power of assistance and allies. While the war in 1982 was a solely British affair, there was significant support (both diplomatic, logistical and military) from a number of nations including the US, 5-Eyes partners, EU and others.
Today we are seeing an unprecedented outpouring of support for Ukraine and their fight against Russia. This support sends a clear message that we live an era when those who seek to attack and conquer democracies will pay a heavy price.
There
is a curious symmetry that the stinger missile, which was supplied by the USA to
the UK during the Falklands War is also being supplied 40 years later to
Ukraine to attack Russian forces. This is in addition to the heavy and
plentiful supply of munitions from the UK to help keep Ukrainian forces
fighting and give them a technological edge.
The
UK should be rightly proud of taking a leading role in providing overt and very
effective lethal support for Ukraine. It is vital that Russia does not succeed,
for the same reasons that Argentina could not succeed – we must not live in a
world where the bully is empowered to take what they wish without penalty.
For
all this equipment change though, what has not changed is the quality of the
individual person that operates, maintains, or fights. The armed forces of today
have visibly changed for the better – far more diverse, fully open to both
genders and with the ludicrous ban on homosexuality lifted, they are far more representative
of modern society. The men and women who serve have also repeatedly shown that
they are every inch the equal of their predecessors, and arguably possibly even
better in some respects.
Much
as in 1982 when the Argentine forces, which on paper were well equipped but conscript
heavy fared poorly when up against the wholly professional British forces, the Ukraine
conflict is serving as a reminder, if one was needed, that it matters not what
kit you have, for if your will to fight is not there, or your people are
demoralised conscripts operating in poor conditions, then they will struggle
when sent against seasoned veterans fighting for their land and homes.
The human
element continues to be the factor by which wars are won and lost, and right
now it appears that history is repeating itself, with a dictators largely
conscript army being routed by a smaller but more determined force of
Ukrainians. It must be hoped that much like the 1982 conflict saw the collapse
of the Junta, the collapse of the evil that is Putins regime, and its replacement
by a democratic Russia is not far away.
The
final thought is that we must be careful that this is not a celebration, nor is
it a chance to revel in thoughts of victory. The Falklands War saw almost 1000
people lose their lives in barely 10 weeks and many thousands more suffer injuries,
often life changing. It was a difficult and bloody war, and our reflections should
not unduly glamorise it.
Wars
start because vainglorious despots believe they are the distraction to their problems.
The Falklands War, like the Ukraine War, is a conflict that should never have
happened, and which saw untold suffering, destruction and misery inflicted in
the name of despotism. We cannot say ‘never again’ for we know that the world
does not work this way, but we can ensure that when it does happen again, the
transgressor continues to pay a hefty price for their crimes.
We
live in a world where today the Falkland Islands remain a democracy, with the
islanders able to live a life they wish to live and aligned with the UK because
of this sacrifice, and the fact that 255 British men laid their lives down to
make it happen and 694 Argentineans were lost defending a lie. That is an
incredibly high blood price, that should never have had to be paid.
Comments
Post a Comment