Sailing the Seven Seas - CSG21 arrives in the Pacific
The Royal Navy aircraft carrier HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH has been
operating in the Pacific Ocean, and having transited the Luzon Strait, has now
arrived in the Philippine Sea.
These waters, which were the scenes of some of the most significant
naval battles in history, and which are arguably synonymous with maritime
airpower, due to the battles of the Second World War are far from home, but
still of enormous interest to the UK.
This global deployment of the Carrier Strike Group has been
a helpful reminder on several levels of both the importance of maritime (air)power,
and why it is a vital capability in the 21st Century.
![]() |
Image by Ministry of Defence; © Crown copyright |
The fact that the Royal Navy can send a multi-national Strike
Group to the other side of the world, and operate as a fully integrated force
sends a remarkably powerful signal to nations. The film footage taken of a Replenishment
at Sea underway, with the Dutch frigate ‘Van Evertsen’ and the QUEEN ELIZABETH
both taking on supplies from RFA TIDESPRING,
while the QE was conducting fixed wing flying operations is both stunning and
sends a clear message.
To our allies it symbolises that the UK can stand up and
deploy a phenomenally capable force, capable of sustaining itself over vast distances,
and thoroughly integrate the various component parts together to work
effectively as a fighting body.
Replenishment at Sea is difficult, and relatively few navies
do it very often because the potential for things to go wrong is high. To do it
between ships from two different countries is rarer still. To do it between
ships of two different countries, while conducting fixed wing flying
operations, well that’s a level of capability that very, very few people can aspire
to or do.
The message this image sends is a simple one – the Royal
Navy is a serious, professional, and VERY capable operator at sea, and makes the
very difficult look like a piece of cake. If they can do this, what are they
capable of when it comes to taking the gloves off and engaging in combat?
For those seeking reassurance of our commitment or support,
or who want to consider working more closely with the British, this image also
sends another message. It says that working closely with the UK means that if
you are in trouble, then some potentially very capable assistance may be on
hand to support.
To other allies it sends a simple message that the UK is
able to play a valued part where required in the world, and does things most
other countries cannot even think about trying. The images of the RAS will have
been noted as a gentle reminder that the RN can be considered as an ‘ally of
value’ and one that is genuinely capable of doing difficult tasks effectively.
Other countries may draw a slightly different message from
this image. It shows that nations outside your sphere of interest and influence
are both able, and willing, to sail in your area of interest, and do so on
their terms.
The near histrionic reaction from some of the Chinese press
points to a level of insecurity to a degree – the offensive commentary
determined to demean and diminish the Royal Navy presence in the region is
actually surprisingly helpful in reminding us that, despite public messages to
the contrary, Beijing does care about this deployment.
The reason for this is that it reminds the Chinese that the
South China Sea is not a lake for the exclusive use of the PLAN. The message is
that foreign nations from outside the region can, and will, sail at a time of
their choosing in the area, and there is nothing that Beijing can do to stop
this.
This in turn matters because the multi-national nature of
the task group shows that this isn’t just ‘little Britain’ on a jolly trip. It’s
an international task force, and if the UK and other nations are willing to
work together operationally in the region for a deployment, when else might
they be able to do so?
The message is that there is a capable and effective international
carrier task group in the South China Sea. It is a direct challenge to a
narrative, and a reminder that other nations are not prepared to cede effective
control of these waters. When coupled with deployments by other nations – for example
the French Navy recently operated here, and the Germans are on the verge of
sending a frigate out to the region too.
![]() |
Image by Ministry of Defence; © Crown copyright |
Some will ask why the UK is interested in the remote waters
of the Pacific – surely we have problems closer to home to take care of? This argument
is easily made, but stands up to little scrutiny. We live in a world that is
increasingly interconnected, and interdependent on each other.
The events of earlier this year, when the Suez Canal was blocked
show that disruption to the global economy can occur because of an incident in
a single location. The idea that weeks of supply chain impact, disruption to shop
supplies and economic losses were incurred due to a single ship seems
incredible, but is true – as a global society we are inextricably linked to
each other.
An event in the maritime domain far from home can and will
impact directly on us here in the UK. Piracy, hostage taking, attacks on
shipping by rogue states – all of these could potentially impact on our way of
life through shipping disruption, delays to port arrivals, or just the loss of
parts in a ‘just in time’ supply chain.
The act of deploying maritime power out to the Pacific helps
act as a reminder that the UK can help to positively shape events and reduce
the likelihood of disruption. This could occur anywhere along the vast global shipping
lanes, as is being seen over recent events in the Indian Ocean where Iranian regime
elements have targeted merchant ships. The key message though is that a
deployment of this scale proves that the UK can and will be able to send a
response if required.
Of course this response won’t always be a Carrier Strike
Group, but there is a growing desire to do more in the Indian/Pacific Ocean
areas. The news that two RN OPVs will be forward deployed into the region is
helpful in sending a reminder message that, even if the QUEEN ELIZABETH is not
present, the UK interest continues.
Some may wonder what value there is of two smaller patrol
ships being permanently operational in the area is. Arguably there is huge
value, although much of it comes from smaller intangible things that pay dividends
later on.
The beauty of the RIVER Class is that they are a relatively
simple ship to work with and can be used in a wide variety of situations. The
UK has not had warships permanently operating in the Pacific region since 1997,
and many of the local ties that existed before at working level have diminished
as RN deployments became fewer in number.
By having ships around it helps reopen basic dialogue and operational
experience. For example, even the practise of arranging ship visits, providing
stores, navigating through the complex web of diplomatic and official channels
to provide the right paperwork and knowing who the right person to call in a
crisis would be, is all vital knowledge.
By having the two ships operating across the region, this
low level engagement grows, rebuilding insight into how to operate locally and
building strong links with regional militaries.
The RIVER class will never be able to destroy enemy fleets,
but if you want vessels able to do the low level maritime constabulary role,
build training links, take the next generation of foreign Officer Cadets to sea
or function as a backdrop and host to a
British Ministerial visit, then these ships are perfect.
They can carry out the routine drumbeat of activity,
engagement, support to Defence Sections in Embassies and High Commissions and
help keep links alive at working levels between militaries, and act as a gentle
reminder of UK interest in the region.
In turn this means that when larger deployments occur into
the region – for example Carrier Strike or Littoral Strike Groups, then not
only are additional ships on hand, but there are strong links in place to make
the visits, and the necessary support, a success.
All too often people look at defence presence as being about guns, missiles and grey menacing hull able to kick arse and take names. In fact an effective defence presence is arguably as much about the soft picture – knowing who the senior officer is in the Fleet visitor team to get emergency DIPCLEAR, or having a favour to call in to secure access for a visitor or supplies. By building the working links at mundane level, it makes the more senior work go much more smoothly.
The reality remains far more mundane – the fact is that
ships need repairs, they need planned maintenance and they need to be ready to
go to sea on a cyclical basis to ensure that there is always a constant set of
ships ready for deployment. This is hardly news, it’s a readiness cycle that
every navy in the world works to, although it is depressing to see it presented
in the press as a uniquely British failure to ensure that ships are repaired
and maintained.
In truth Royal Navy ship availability is generally good, and
given how hard the ships work, and how often they deploy, it squeezes a lot of
value for money from hard worked hulls and people. Most navies out there are
envious of the ability of the RN to get so much out of its force, and to
operate globally with such apparent ease.
The fact is that the Royal Navy is once again demonstrating
its global reach and capability. To have a force sail thousands of miles from home,
operating with multiple different navies, take part in many different
operations and continue to deliver what is asked of it, even with constant
disruption from COVID and other issues is a real testament to the capability of
the RN.
To those who would seek to mock or moan, ask yourself what success
looks like in your eyes, and show a comparable nation out there able to do as much
with the naval forces it has? There are two countries in the world right now
with aircraft carriers deployed abroad, and the UK is one of them. This is a
message of success and capability that many aspire to, but few achieve.
There are doubtless challenges ahead, but when we look at
the journey we’ve come on, and how far it has come, then it is hard not to be
both very proud, and very excited about the future that lies ahead still.
A really well crafted and thoughtful, balanced argument for ‘Global Britain’ 🇬🇧. Well done!
ReplyDeleteA really well crafted and thoughtful, balanced argument for ‘Global Britain’ 🇬🇧. Well done!
ReplyDeleteA excellent article in respect to the peacetime Navy. But maintaining a CSG capability, as excellent and versatile as it, represents at least an 8th of our total defence capability. It may therefore in the future be too valuable to risk for non vital national interests, nor alone can it easily create political change through military force in the case of failed states, insurgencies or total intransigence. Against Peer forces it acts to deter but only as an addition to a equations that may well decide the prize is worth the risk. It successfully bolsters one Alliance in that respect and therefore its utility depends on the willingness of that Partner and the accord of political aims. As a Navy we are excellent, as a military investment I do not believe it is so clear cut.
ReplyDeleteNot mocking or moaning.China knows that it can sink a UK carrier at will, so all they will do is bully it around a bit, making us look weak.At least they are an disciplined nation, although not their fishing fleet who tend to float about at night with no lights. Some are suggesting that it should have been sent to the gulf instead, where it could be attacked by all kinds of lunatics for very low cost. We might not even know who to retaliate against.
ReplyDeleteThe rivers have been built without even hangers, no one is going to be impressed, whether friend or foe.