Young Adults Real Soldiers - Why Recruiting at 16 Should Continue.
The MOD has once again been attacked for the practise of
recruiting 16yr olds to join the Armed Forces. According to reports cited in the
Guardian,
a paediatrician and health professional have attacked the MOD for the practise,
which apparently puts childrens health at risk, and does not allow them the ability
to make a rational choice.
There has long been opposition to the idea that 16yr olds
can join the armed forces in the UK, which is apparently alone in Europe in
permitting this practise to occur. There are concerns about the youth of the
individuals, the risk they are exposed to and the fact that they may be too
young to understand what they are getting into. Added to this are concerns that
the Armed Forces recruit from deprived socio-economic areas, giving the perception
that somehow young potential recruits are expendable cannon fodder.
There is a strong patronisingly paternalistic presumption in
parts of UK society that somehow ‘experts know best’ when it comes to what young
adults and people from deprived backgrounds need. It is frustrating to watch
people from usually immensely privileged backgrounds, many of whom have had
access to education and opportunity far beyond that which their supposed ‘victims’
will have access to, speak loftily about what is best, and why joining the Army
is a bad thing.
![]() |
AFC Harrogate- Image by Ministry of Defence; © Crown copyright |
The reality is that the Armed Forces do not recruit 16yr
olds off the street and send them straight to war. Despite the long held myths,
lovingly cherished in some quarters that uncaring generals want their cannon
fodder young so as to be stupid enough to run at barbed wire entanglements, it
is not possible to go to war as an under 18 year old.
Instead junior recruits will usually be put through training,
education and given the chance to acquire skills and a trade. One only has to
look at the immense work done by the
Army Foundation College at Harrogate, who do a superb job at taking young
people and providing them with the foundation skills for a successful career.
Recruits under the age of 18 can give notice and leave as they see fit – the same
as any other job.
Young adults today operate in a confusing world where they
are placed under significant pressure to deliver results and make something of
themselves. Many youngsters may feel left out, isolated or abandoned, and struggle
to fit in to society. Others grow up in difficult circumstances and are perhaps
looking for some direction, guidance and discipline to put their life back on
track.
The Army is not an easy career choice – it is physically and
mentally demanding, placing people in difficult circumstances where they have
to deliver difficult things. But it is an employer that believes in training,
education and recognition for peoples efforts.
Humphrey has lost count of the number of people he has met,
or engaged with, who openly admit that as a youth they were directionless, in trouble
and drifting in life and with few, if any, prospects for a successful career.
Their big break, and chance to escape their difficult circumstances, came by the
chance to join early and get into the military system before it was too late.
Some people thrive on military life, particularly at a young
age where for the first time they are subject to discipline, but also genuinely
supportive friends, encouragement, support and opportunity to make something of
themselves. The process of training at places like Harrogate helps shape people
who want to make something of their life.
For the military the benefit of entry under 18 is that it
provides extra time to train up engineers and apprentices who need to do long
training courses that may last several years. They can take people used to
being in school and provide additional training to help them get a job that
will give them a life time of skills and employability, while also providing a
vital skill to the armed forces. In a future where there will be a battle for
talent and engineers, the ability to recruit talented youth at 16 is vital in helping
build this talent pool.
The rewards are considerable – despite the suggestion that
somehow the Army is relying on ‘poor people’ as cannon fodder, the reality is
that a career in the military provides a huge number of benefits. It offers
accommodation, free educational qualifications – up to and including funding
for MA’s and PhDs, the chance to travel the world and do Adventure Training,
and the chance to make something of your life.
It is a job that is extremely well paid – for someone
joining young and with no qualifications, they have the opportunity to be in a job
earning almost £30k per year within a few years. The Army represents a very genuine
opportunity to give people social mobility and escape their surroundings and
give themselves, and their families, hope for a better future.
It is so frustrating to listen to people who have never served,
and who have no concept of what it means to be part of something like this want
to take away this chance for young people on the pathway to nowhere to instead
make something of their life. How many lives that could amount to something magnificent
will instead be missed and lost in a path of drudgery, due to poor life choices
between 16 and 18?
Raising the
recruiting age will not help people who need an intervention and escape now –
it merely makes it harder to offer an escape to people trapped in a life they want
to leave behind. Humphrey is a passionate believer in the positive power of
good that the military can make to chaotic lives that need direction. Look at
the magnificent work of the Cadet Units, which are emphatically not recruiting
organisations, but which exist to provide help and advice to young people and
give them skills that can make an enormous difference too.
Only last week a 14yr
old Cadet saved the life of a 92yr old woman who was in a car crash. Lance Corporal
Rollisson took charge of a situation, delivering life saving first aid to someone,
drawing on the skills taught in cadets, while “When police
arrived, one of the officers said "you seem to have this under control
young lady’’ and started to move traffic so the ambulance could get through.”On completion,
she then went to school for the day.
These actions were rightly praised on Twitter by senior
officers, with the Army publicly recognising her efforts and commending her.
Yet this is not unusual – a search for ‘Army cadet saved life’ on google brings
up dozens of news stories of where the Cadet movement saved the life of members
of the public, usually relying on the skills taught in the Cadets.
These youth are the people who should not be denied the
chance to make something of their lives at age 16. The Cadet Movement, and the
Army Foundation college is the sort of organisation that has the power and
ability to make an enormous difference to people and give them a real chance in
life.
Of course there needs to be special care taken, and there is
no doubt that it can be challenging at times. The Armed Forces need to ensure
that the recruits under 18 are properly looked after and not exposed – for they
are still not an adult in the eyes of the law. But, the potential opportunities
and reward that a career brings, and a path to escape is vital.
This is something Humphrey feels passionately about, living
in an area where gang crime is a challenge. Watching young youths bleeding on
the street outside his house from stab wounds, and the hysteria of mothers as
they realise their child is on the streets with a knife, and then seeing armed
police deployed to find them was deeply unsettling. The blunt reality is that
there is an entire generation growing up who need an escape route to be a
Soldier, not a ‘Solja’ and closing the door to them at 16 will not help.
The Armed Forces offer an amazing opportunity to make
something of your life and explore your talents and abilities. It is easy when
living in an ivory tower to want to reach out and ‘do good’ but in reality your
misplaced intervention is making life worse for those you profess to want to
help.
Give people a chance to be the best they can be in life – let
them join at 16, don’t’ hamstring them by applying misguided social fluffiness and
ruin peoples lives for the good of your social conscience. Why not instead give people trust, responsibility,
reward, training, adventure, challenge and hope? That’s ultimately what a
career in the British Armed Forces is all about.
As always a lucid and insightful comment on a forces related item in the news.
ReplyDeleteOne thing did concern me was the statement on the radio by one of the authors that former junior soldiers were more likely to be killed or wounded than adult recruits on operations.
This appeared to me to be counter intuitive and I wonder if
1 There is any basis in fact or
2 If true why should this be. Is it that statistically a higher proportion serve in the combat and combat support arms, or do they have a lower sense of self preservation? I would have thought that the longer training would inculcate the drills to reduce the risks.
Having tracked the links back to the original report; it is that junior soldiers are more likely to join combat arms which in Afghan had 7x casualty rate of non-frontline. Also suicide rate higher than general population but in line with that of the socioeconomic group of the intake. So statistical legerdemain.
ReplyDeleteThis critical view comes from luckily or unluckily only certain new sites with the agenda that there's this robotic army recruiting helpless sixteen year olds that should vote in elections off the streets and throw them again enemies.
ReplyDeleteThe Guardian article is here: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/feb/26/uk-army-should-stop-recruiting-children-health-experts-say
ReplyDeleteThere is a broad international consensus on recruitment ages - most of the rest of the countries who allow recruits to join at 16 are either LEDCs or dictatorships (or both).
Personally I find the current bodge job of allowing people to join at 16 but not allowing them to do the full job until 18 a bit awkward and I think we should just raise the age to 18 and have done with it, especially as the evidence seems to suggest that the 16 year old recruits are not going into the technical specialisms but are joining the infantry instead.
It's also worth noting the really lame argument the Army put forth in attempting to refute the claim (at the bottom of the Guardian article), which totally ignores the points raised in favour of reiterating that soldiers cannot serve in the front line until they are 18. If they can't come up with a better defence than that I doubt it will last much longer.
I would point out that Welbeck takes 16 year olds in and they are for all the services including Civil Service, I personally know a few people who went there first and are now Officers in the different services. I have also seen first hand the work at AFC Harrogate and it teaches these young people a lot more than just soldiering, the training in all aspects of life and education is to be commended not stopped( the local pizza delivery service in Harrogate would have to shut down if AFC were to close ;-))
ReplyDelete